Difference between revisions of "Talk:USB reference" - Pandora Wiki

(Move Request: no move)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
:I oppose it. This article is well-organized as it is, and the "FAQ" is just one section of it. It makes no sense to fix what isn't broken. "Reference" does NOT mean "all informations or devices"; that is not the correct definition. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 16:46, 26 April 2011 (MEST)
 
:I oppose it. This article is well-organized as it is, and the "FAQ" is just one section of it. It makes no sense to fix what isn't broken. "Reference" does NOT mean "all informations or devices"; that is not the correct definition. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 16:46, 26 April 2011 (MEST)
 
::Ok so I revoked the move and let the article as it is --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 00:12, 28 April 2011 (MEST)
 
::Ok so I revoked the move and let the article as it is --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 00:12, 28 April 2011 (MEST)
 +
 +
NO, we do not resort to a FAQ, this page sucks and we need to fix it. Questions answer themselves once the info is clear. We need a chart of what you can plug in where and what it does.
 +
--[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 04:14, 8 October 2013 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 03:14, 8 October 2013

I changed all Mini A, standard USB A etc. mentions into mini-A, standard-A etc. as they appear in the various USB standard documents. I also corrected all instances where plug names etc. were wrong and clarified some things. I spent quite some time in the last few weeks reading the USB docs so I have some confidence that I got most of this crap sorted out... OrR

Move Request

Hi, this is not a reference in meaning of "all informations or devices related to USB", so to me it seem to be wise to move this to a FAQ, that it is already. What does you say? --ABC 07:39, 24 April 2011 (MEST)

Why not, but then you need to change the "Pandora as USB slave", ... parts to answers to questions too, like "What can my Pandora do as a Slave?" or something like that. T4b 13:04, 26 April 2011 (MEST)
I oppose it. This article is well-organized as it is, and the "FAQ" is just one section of it. It makes no sense to fix what isn't broken. "Reference" does NOT mean "all informations or devices"; that is not the correct definition. Esn 16:46, 26 April 2011 (MEST)
Ok so I revoked the move and let the article as it is --ABC 00:12, 28 April 2011 (MEST)

NO, we do not resort to a FAQ, this page sucks and we need to fix it. Questions answer themselves once the info is clear. We need a chart of what you can plug in where and what it does. --Kingu (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2013 (CEST)

Top