Difference between revisions of "Talk:Production Timeline"

From Pandora Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(merge of history and production timeline?)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
--[[User:Cheese|Cheese]] 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)
 
--[[User:Cheese|Cheese]] 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)
  
== 13 Aug ==
+
== Merge of history and production timeline? ==
 
+
We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal?
I had been avoiding the random partial build statuses, only counting actual shipments, so I might change this when they actually leave. According to ED, these PCBs are not with Craig yet
+
(two old comments cleared.) -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)
 
 
== There's a reason I put it on the main page ==
 
 
 
"Open Pandora is so lazy!  2000 units in two years?  Come on!"
 
 
 
<nowiki>*looks*</nowiki>
 
 
 
"Oh wait, they went through tons of shit. Silly me!"
 
 
 
[[User:Blue Protoman|Blue Protoman]] 02:26, 20 February 2011 (MET)
 
  
 
== We need more info ==
 
== We need more info ==
Line 32: Line 22:
 
Todo, add ext tv-out cable.
 
Todo, add ext tv-out cable.
 
--[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)
 
--[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)
 +
:* Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)

Revision as of 14:44, 20 November 2013

Brief history here: [1] --Cheese 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)

Merge of history and production timeline?

We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal? (two old comments cleared.) -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)

We need more info

We need to add a bit more info to the timeline. Notably, the entire fiasco with the case factory is missing. Someone mind shedding some light on this?

Blue Protoman 02:28, 20 February 2011 (MET)

Not quite sure what your point is? The fiasco with the case factory is pretty normal in the course of production. Did anything tangible occur in 2009? We saw a few iterations of the case, some software work, and I think 2010 started with the wifi no longer working. Maybe the case thing was the most visible outside the team, but thats how long these things take. It's still all on GP32X, so all it takes is for someone to go back and see if there are a few key items to pull out. I'd rather this page didn't end up being a 'why did it take so long' discussion - that can be something else if you want. If you want data, ask on the forum. --Tsh 11:09, 20 February 2011 (MET)

Table or heirachical list

I much prefer the format here which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.

  • Yeah, I prefer the old way too. Esn 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)
i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. double7 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)
  • yyyy toc style added. Two years blocks look better than very small yearly chapters. double7 12:02, 10 May 2012 (CEST)

Todo, add ext tv-out cable. --Kingu (talk) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)

  • Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)