Difference between revisions of "Talk:Production Timeline"

From Pandora Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Table or heirachical list: new section)
(Table or heirachical list)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.
 
I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.
 +
*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)

Revision as of 06:09, 24 June 2011

Brief history here: [1] --Cheese 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)

13 Aug

I had been avoiding the random partial build statuses, only counting actual shipments, so I might change this when they actually leave. According to ED, these PCBs are not with Craig yet

There's a reason I put it on the main page

"Open Pandora is so lazy! 2000 units in two years? Come on!"

*looks*

"Oh wait, they went through tons of shit. Silly me!"

Blue Protoman 02:26, 20 February 2011 (MET)

We need more info

We need to add a bit more info to the timeline. Notably, the entire fiasco with the case factory is missing. Someone mind shedding some light on this?

Blue Protoman 02:28, 20 February 2011 (MET)

Not quite sure what your point is? The fiasco with the case factory is pretty normal in the course of production. Did anything tangible occur in 2009? We saw a few iterations of the case, some software work, and I think 2010 started with the wifi no longer working. Maybe the case thing was the most visible outside the team, but thats how long these things take. It's still all on GP32X, so all it takes is for someone to go back and see if there are a few key items to pull out. I'd rather this page didn't end up being a 'why did it take so long' discussion - that can be something else if you want. If you want data, ask on the forum. --Tsh 11:09, 20 February 2011 (MET)

Table or heirachical list

I much prefer the format here which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.

  • Yeah, I prefer the old way too. Esn 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)