Difference between revisions of "Pyra SoC"
From Pandora Wiki
(added note about open source) |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | * concerning open source, with omap 5 the trouble is the optional 3d drivers (openvr), potentially also their add on wifi solution. | ||
| + | I would argue that intel is worse, since you have to run uefi bios to boot, which isnt an optional step. Intel does not share specs here to coreboot like amd does. | ||
| + | --[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:52, 9 February 2014
Pros and Cons of each SoC.
| How important is this aspect? | OMAP 5 | Snapdragon 800/ | Snapdragon 805 | Z3770 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General purpose power | lowest | higher | even higher | highest | |
| open source friendliness | better | worst | worst | best | |
| Battery life |
- concerning open source, with omap 5 the trouble is the optional 3d drivers (openvr), potentially also their add on wifi solution.
I would argue that intel is worse, since you have to run uefi bios to boot, which isnt an optional step. Intel does not share specs here to coreboot like amd does. --Kingu (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (CET)
