Difference between revisions of "Talk:Port requests"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Does anyone know why GemRB [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Port_Requests&diff=1356&oldid=1354 was removed]? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 05:29, 7 June 2009 (CEST) | Does anyone know why GemRB [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Port_Requests&diff=1356&oldid=1354 was removed]? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 05:29, 7 June 2009 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just had a poke around, turns out GemRB is now a WIP courtesy of Adventus. ;-) We need to (somehow) encourage people to use the Summary box when making changes! [[User:Gruso|Gruso]] 23:27, 7 June 2009 (CEST) |
Revision as of 21:27, 7 June 2009
Numptyphysics is shown here: http://amethyst.openembedded.net/~koen/narcissus/ Seems to be supported already - Didn't test it yet though
The last Carrier Instant Messenger SVN change was 2 month ago, do we really need that? Isn't Pidgin enough? We should have some sort of priority system because I have the feeling that some games and apps are just added here to have a bigger list - no matter what quality the entries are. Personally I know a lot of people who use Pidgin, no-one seems to have used Carrier yet. --JayFoxRox
- Well, I use Carrier. It was created because Pidgin had( has) an annoying feature that the developers in charge refused to make optional. They generally keep up with Pidgin versions, although it's one version behind at the moment. As I understand it, this is basically a list of portable apps that are wanted by at least one person from the Pandora community. It would be problematic making a "priority system". The point, I think, is for the devs to just scroll around and see if there's anything that they'd like to port. I guess one way to make a "priority system" is to have some kind of voting or something... in which case, a developer can choose some apps from here and start a poll on the GP32X forums to see which is most popular. Esn 09:17, 27 May 2009 (CEST)
- P.S. You can sign your name and date with four tildes at the end of your message ~ ~ ~ ~ (but without spaces). Esn 09:20, 27 May 2009 (CEST)
Does anyone know why GemRB was removed? Esn 05:29, 7 June 2009 (CEST)
Just had a poke around, turns out GemRB is now a WIP courtesy of Adventus. ;-) We need to (somehow) encourage people to use the Summary box when making changes! Gruso 23:27, 7 June 2009 (CEST)