Difference between revisions of "Talk:InfoIndex"
From Pandora Wiki
(→"Merge" discussion: split up list for blogs, archives,...) |
(→"Merge" discussion) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Looks good, we could introduce a little 'offical pandora' icon? To me it would be wise to manage linklists here in the wiki, as everybody can update them and it's a central place for linking from all the distributed forums etc. --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 07:37, 22 April 2011 (MEST) | :Looks good, we could introduce a little 'offical pandora' icon? To me it would be wise to manage linklists here in the wiki, as everybody can update them and it's a central place for linking from all the distributed forums etc. --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 07:37, 22 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
:What about collecting the sites in a distributed way like [[blogs]], [[portals]], [[pnd archives]],...? If we need all on a central page, we could use projection to condense all of this stuff together. --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 19:35, 26 April 2011 (MEST) | :What about collecting the sites in a distributed way like [[blogs]], [[portals]], [[pnd archives]],...? If we need all on a central page, we could use projection to condense all of this stuff together. --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 19:35, 26 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
+ | ::I don't think there are so many of them that we need to split them up into different articles. There really aren't all that many Pandora sites. I actually think it might make sense to have them in some kind of sortable-table form like the software lists. That way you can sort by categories such as site category and site author (for example, Craigix has a Twitter account, a Youtube account, and a store - so by sorting by different columns, people will be able to find all of his sites, or also see just Youtube sites or just stores. On the other hand, it might make sense to split have a separate article if we're going to list individual Youtube videos, since there are a great deal of these, to avoid cluttering up the main links list. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 03:37, 27 April 2011 (MEST) |
Latest revision as of 01:37, 27 April 2011
Hmm... this is all looking quite out of date too. More of the important forum stuff ought to be on the wiki now, but I can see this being a good link pool for 'read all these first if you want to get up to speed'
"Merge" discussion
I don't think it should be merged with community links because many of the links here are official. Rather, perhaps that other page should be merged with this one. To be honest, the links on this page are a lot more useful than the links on that one.
But some can be salvaged. For example "videos" should probably link not so much to individual videos, as to Youtube channels which have Pandora videos.
Maybe use Middo's Pandora Bookmark website as a template. Esn 07:13, 22 April 2011 (MEST)
- Looks good, we could introduce a little 'offical pandora' icon? To me it would be wise to manage linklists here in the wiki, as everybody can update them and it's a central place for linking from all the distributed forums etc. --ABC 07:37, 22 April 2011 (MEST)
- What about collecting the sites in a distributed way like blogs, portals, pnd archives,...? If we need all on a central page, we could use projection to condense all of this stuff together. --ABC 19:35, 26 April 2011 (MEST)
- I don't think there are so many of them that we need to split them up into different articles. There really aren't all that many Pandora sites. I actually think it might make sense to have them in some kind of sortable-table form like the software lists. That way you can sort by categories such as site category and site author (for example, Craigix has a Twitter account, a Youtube account, and a store - so by sorting by different columns, people will be able to find all of his sites, or also see just Youtube sites or just stores. On the other hand, it might make sense to split have a separate article if we're going to list individual Youtube videos, since there are a great deal of these, to avoid cluttering up the main links list. Esn 03:37, 27 April 2011 (MEST)