Difference between revisions of "Talk:Introduction to PNDs"
From Pandora Wiki
(→Merge with PND:FAQ) |
(→Merge with PND:FAQ) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST) | this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST) | I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
| − | :I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2). | + | :I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page except for "Advanced topics" could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2. "Advanced topics" can be merged with "Advanced information" in the PND:FAQ article). |
:However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST) | :However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:09, 29 April 2011
I want to override the .PND icon, name, or other settings, how is this done?
This section mentions changing the clock speed, but Overclocking seems to cover the current method. I'm not sure... --Tsh 01:24, 25 February 2011 (MET)
Merge with PND:FAQ
Hi, this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --ABC 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST) I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use PND as an general introduction, PND FAQ as a general FAQ style and of course libPND for introducing in development with PXML --ABC 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)
- I think you're right about this. This page and PND:FAQ do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page except for "Advanced topics" could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2. "Advanced topics" can be merged with "Advanced information" in the PND:FAQ article).
- However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. Esn 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST)
