Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hardware documentation"
From Pandora Wiki
(New page: does the pandora use the r2p2 revision that beagleboard.org links to? or does it use a newer/older revision?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
or does it use a newer/older revision? | or does it use a newer/older revision? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Ugly layout== | ||
| + | The way that the two pages here were combined by Kingu is exceedingly ugly and unusable. Why no TOC at the top? Why TOC partway down the page? The same issue applies for many other pages on the wiki that were combined in recent months - it looks like they are tacked on to each other with no thought at all about coherent integration. [[User:Esn|Esn]] ([[User talk:Esn|talk]]) 06:40, 9 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, categories and "see also" goes at the BOTTOM of a page, not in the middle - these conventions are in place both for readability and to make editing easier. This cut-and-paste job is just terrible. [[User:Esn|Esn]] ([[User talk:Esn|talk]]) 06:42, 9 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:42, 9 September 2013
does the pandora use the r2p2 revision that beagleboard.org links to?
or does it use a newer/older revision?
Ugly layout
The way that the two pages here were combined by Kingu is exceedingly ugly and unusable. Why no TOC at the top? Why TOC partway down the page? The same issue applies for many other pages on the wiki that were combined in recent months - it looks like they are tacked on to each other with no thought at all about coherent integration. Esn (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2013 (CEST)
Also, categories and "see also" goes at the BOTTOM of a page, not in the middle - these conventions are in place both for readability and to make editing easier. This cut-and-paste job is just terrible. Esn (talk) 06:42, 9 September 2013 (CEST)
