Difference between revisions of "User talk:Foxblock"
From Pandora Wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just want to say, thanks a lot for [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Software_projects&action=historysubmit&diff=7397&oldid=7353 this edit]. I honestly had no idea how to organize that section, and was just waiting for someone to come along who had a better understanding. By the way, if B-Zar [http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/59231-panorama/ manages to get Panorama running], which category would it fall into? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 05:14, 14 April 2011 (MEST) | Just want to say, thanks a lot for [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Software_projects&action=historysubmit&diff=7397&oldid=7353 this edit]. I honestly had no idea how to organize that section, and was just waiting for someone to come along who had a better understanding. By the way, if B-Zar [http://www.gp32x.com/board/index.php?/topic/59231-panorama/ manages to get Panorama running], which category would it fall into? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 05:14, 14 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
:Hey, no problem. I guess with a little bit of reconsidering one could also diversify those descriptions a bit more. Pandora basically is a shiny version of MiniMenu (it has the same features, just looks a lot better), so it would fall in the "Simple launcher" category (btw, I really don't like the term "Simple launcher" it kind of implies it is not able to do anything or no work has gone into it, but I could not come up with a better term, any ideas?) [[User:Foxblock|Foxblock]] 12:34, 14 April 2011 (MEST) | :Hey, no problem. I guess with a little bit of reconsidering one could also diversify those descriptions a bit more. Pandora basically is a shiny version of MiniMenu (it has the same features, just looks a lot better), so it would fall in the "Simple launcher" category (btw, I really don't like the term "Simple launcher" it kind of implies it is not able to do anything or no work has gone into it, but I could not come up with a better term, any ideas?) [[User:Foxblock|Foxblock]] 12:34, 14 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
| + | ::Well, no... and it doesn't seem derogatory to me. Actually, it would be really helpful if you added a bit of text to that section to explain what the categories mean. A Google for "simple launcher" doesn't turn up anything useful (well, maybe it's just me). [[User:Esn|Esn]] 20:48, 14 April 2011 (MEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 14 April 2011
Thanks
Just want to say, thanks a lot for this edit. I honestly had no idea how to organize that section, and was just waiting for someone to come along who had a better understanding. By the way, if B-Zar manages to get Panorama running, which category would it fall into? Esn 05:14, 14 April 2011 (MEST)
- Hey, no problem. I guess with a little bit of reconsidering one could also diversify those descriptions a bit more. Pandora basically is a shiny version of MiniMenu (it has the same features, just looks a lot better), so it would fall in the "Simple launcher" category (btw, I really don't like the term "Simple launcher" it kind of implies it is not able to do anything or no work has gone into it, but I could not come up with a better term, any ideas?) Foxblock 12:34, 14 April 2011 (MEST)
- Well, no... and it doesn't seem derogatory to me. Actually, it would be really helpful if you added a bit of text to that section to explain what the categories mean. A Google for "simple launcher" doesn't turn up anything useful (well, maybe it's just me). Esn 20:48, 14 April 2011 (MEST)
