Difference between revisions of "Talk:Production Timeline"

From Pandora Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Merge of history and production timeline?)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
--[[User:Cheese|Cheese]] 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)
 
--[[User:Cheese|Cheese]] 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)
  
== 13 Aug ==
+
== Merge of history and production timeline? ==
 +
We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal?
 +
(two old comments cleared.) --[[User:Double7|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)
  
I had been avoiding the random partial build statuses, only counting actual shipments, so I might change this when they actually leave. According to ED, these PCBs are not with Craig yet
+
The idea is to have a fully explanative page featuring the whole process that is in sum something people can read up on and understand things.
 +
Idea, add the trade show appearances and presentations pandora has been to? A timeline extention might also be handy.
 +
--[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 21:35, 20 November 2013 (CET)
  
== There's a reason I put it on the main page ==
+
Could you please explain what "whole process" is in your mind? The history of the full story? Everything that happend around the pandora? --[[User:Double7|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7|talk]]) 10:34, 21 November 2013 (CET)
  
"Open Pandora is so lazy!  2000 units in two years?  Come on!"
+
== We need more info ==
  
*looks*
+
We need to add a bit more info to the timeline.  Notably, the entire fiasco with the case factory is missing.  Someone mind shedding some light on this?
  
"Oh wait, they went through tons of shit. Silly me!"
+
[[User:Blue Protoman|Blue Protoman]] 02:28, 20 February 2011 (MET)
 +
:Not quite sure what your point is? The fiasco with the case factory is pretty normal in the course of production. Did anything tangible occur in 2009? We saw a few iterations of the case, some software work, and I think 2010 started with the wifi no longer working. Maybe the case thing was the most visible outside the team, but thats how long these things take. It's still all on GP32X, so all it takes is for someone to go back and see if there are a few key items to pull out. I'd rather this page didn't end up being a 'why did it take so long' discussion - that can be something else if you want. If you want data, ask on the forum. --[[User:Tsh|Tsh]] 11:09, 20 February 2011 (MET)
  
[[User:Blue Protoman|Blue Protoman]] 02:26, 20 February 2011 (MET)
+
== Table or heirachical list ==
 +
 
 +
I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.
 +
*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)
 +
:i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. [[User:Double7|double7]] 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)
 +
:*yyyy toc style added. Two years blocks look better than very small yearly chapters. [[User:Double7|double7]] 12:02, 10 May 2012 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
Todo, add ext tv-out cable.
 +
--[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)
 +
:* Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. --[[User:Double7|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)
 +
 
 +
I meant when did it go on sale, and when was it produced?
 +
--[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 21:37, 20 November 2013 (CET)

Latest revision as of 09:34, 21 November 2013

Brief history here: [1] --Cheese 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)

Merge of history and production timeline?

We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal? (two old comments cleared.) --double7 (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)

The idea is to have a fully explanative page featuring the whole process that is in sum something people can read up on and understand things. Idea, add the trade show appearances and presentations pandora has been to? A timeline extention might also be handy. --Kingu (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2013 (CET)

Could you please explain what "whole process" is in your mind? The history of the full story? Everything that happend around the pandora? --double7 (talk) 10:34, 21 November 2013 (CET)

We need more info

We need to add a bit more info to the timeline. Notably, the entire fiasco with the case factory is missing. Someone mind shedding some light on this?

Blue Protoman 02:28, 20 February 2011 (MET)

Not quite sure what your point is? The fiasco with the case factory is pretty normal in the course of production. Did anything tangible occur in 2009? We saw a few iterations of the case, some software work, and I think 2010 started with the wifi no longer working. Maybe the case thing was the most visible outside the team, but thats how long these things take. It's still all on GP32X, so all it takes is for someone to go back and see if there are a few key items to pull out. I'd rather this page didn't end up being a 'why did it take so long' discussion - that can be something else if you want. If you want data, ask on the forum. --Tsh 11:09, 20 February 2011 (MET)

Table or heirachical list

I much prefer the format here which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.

  • Yeah, I prefer the old way too. Esn 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)
i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. double7 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)
  • yyyy toc style added. Two years blocks look better than very small yearly chapters. double7 12:02, 10 May 2012 (CEST)

Todo, add ext tv-out cable. --Kingu (talk) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)

  • Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. --double7 (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)

I meant when did it go on sale, and when was it produced? --Kingu (talk) 21:37, 20 November 2013 (CET)