Talk:Production Timeline - Revision history

Double7: /* Merge of history and production timeline? */

2013-11-21T09:34:44Z

‎Merge of history and production timeline?

Kingu at 20:37, 20 November 2013

2013-11-20T20:37:01Z

Kingu at 20:35, 20 November 2013

2013-11-20T20:35:53Z

Double7: merge of history and production timeline? - forgot how to sign ;)

2013-11-20T14:49:17Z

merge of history and production timeline? - forgot how to sign ;)

Double7: merge of history and production timeline?

2013-11-20T14:44:39Z

merge of history and production timeline?

Kingu at 23:27, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T23:27:23Z

Kingu at 23:27, 8 November 2013

2013-11-08T23:27:05Z

Double7: /* Table or heirachical list */

2012-05-10T10:02:16Z

‎Table or heirachical list

Double7: /* Table or heirachical list */ style discussion

2012-03-17T19:03:15Z

‎Table or heirachical list: style discussion

Esn: /* Table or heirachical list */

2011-06-24T06:09:43Z

‎Table or heirachical list

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Idea, add the trade show appearances and presentations pandora has been to? A timeline extention might also be handy.
 --[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 21:35, 20 November 2013 (CET)
 == We need more info ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 20 November 2013
Line 27:		Line 27:
	--[[User:Kingu\|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu\|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)		--[[User:Kingu\|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu\|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)
	:* Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. --[[User:Double7\|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7\|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)		:* Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. --[[User:Double7\|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7\|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	I meant when did it go on sale, and when was it produced?
		+	--[[User:Kingu\|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu\|talk]]) 21:37, 20 November 2013 (CET)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal?
 (two old comments cleared.) --[[User:Double7|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)
 == We need more info ==

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 == Merge of history and production timeline? ==
 We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal?
-(two old comments cleared.) -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)
+(two old comments cleared.) --[[User:Double7|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)
 == We need more info ==
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Todo, add ext tv-out cable.
 --[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)
-:* Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)
+:* Is it that important? If you want to do it it could be a seperate section. --[[User:Double7|double7]] ([[User talk:Double7|talk]]) 15:49, 20 November 2013 (CET)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 --[[User:Cheese|Cheese]] 00:16, 9 July 2010 (MEST)
-== 13 Aug ==
+== Merge of history and production timeline? ==
+We have content dupes due to the merge of the history and the timeline and we have a topic confilct. The production timeline aimed for short facts of things that happend to the final production. A history includes the full story, starts, options and fails, background information to understand the "why". So what's the goal?
-I had been avoiding the random partial build statuses, only counting actual shipments, so I might change this when they actually leave. According to ED, these PCBs are not with Craig yet
+(two old comments cleared.) -15:44, 20 November 2013 (CET)
 == We need more info ==
@@ Line 32: / Line 22: @@
 Todo, add ext tv-out cable.
 --[[User:Kingu|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 8 November 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Todo, add ext tv-out cable.		Todo, add ext tv-out cable.
		+	--[[User:Kingu\|Kingu]] ([[User talk:Kingu\|talk]]) 00:27, 9 November 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 8 November 2013
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)		:i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)
	:*yyyy toc style added. Two years blocks look better than very small yearly chapters. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 12:02, 10 May 2012 (CEST)		:*yyyy toc style added. Two years blocks look better than very small yearly chapters. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 12:02, 10 May 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	Todo, add ext tv-out cable.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:02, 10 May 2012
Line 28:		Line 28:
	*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)		*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)
	:i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)		:i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)
		+	:*yyyy toc style added. Two years blocks look better than very small yearly chapters. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 12:02, 10 May 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 17 March 2012
Line 27:		Line 27:
	I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.		I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.
	*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)		*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)
		+	:i tried it, but it didn't look that great imho. i padded the table for better reading and think it's a good overview. maybe we could highlight the first yyyy's with red. if that's not that good we could split the table to the yyyy toc style mentioned before. and we have a black hole between end of cc and begin of gc pandoras. [[User:Double7\|double7]] 20:03, 17 March 2012 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 24 June 2011
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.		I much prefer the format [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Production_Timeline&oldid=7586 here] which breaks each year down into headings rather than the 'stuff it all in a table' format, which has no benefit. I'll revert it unless anyone can justify the change.
		+	*Yeah, I prefer the old way too. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 08:09, 24 June 2011 (CEST)