Talk:Introduction to PNDs - Revision history

Esn: /* Merge with PND:FAQ */

2011-04-29T07:09:20Z

‎Merge with PND:FAQ

Esn: /* Merge with PND:FAQ */

2011-04-29T07:08:36Z

‎Merge with PND:FAQ

Esn: /* Merge with PND:FAQ */

2011-04-29T07:07:16Z

‎Merge with PND:FAQ

Esn: /* Merge with PND:FAQ */

2011-04-29T07:06:30Z

‎Merge with PND:FAQ

ABC: /* Merge with PND:FAQ */ please merge

2011-04-27T09:39:36Z

‎Merge with PND:FAQ: please merge

ABC: /* Merge with PND:FAQ */ new section

2011-04-23T06:14:19Z

‎Merge with PND:FAQ: new section

Tsh: clock defaults?

2011-02-25T00:24:59Z

clock defaults?

New page

==I want to override the .PND icon, name, or other settings, how is this done?==
This section mentions changing the clock speed, but [[Overclocking]] seems to cover the current method. I'm not sure... --[[User:Tsh|Tsh]] 01:24, 25 February 2011 (MET)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)
 I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)
-:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page except for "Advanced topics" could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2).
+:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page except for "Advanced topics" could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2. "Advanced topics" can be merged with "Advanced information" in the PND:FAQ article).
 :However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)
 I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)
-:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2).
+:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page except for "Advanced topics" could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2).
 :However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)
 I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)
-:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ). Basically, I propose that this whole page could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" (which is currently section 1 there) would now be section 2.
+:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page are a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ - basically, I propose that this whole page could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" - which is currently the first section there - would now be section 2).
 :However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 29 April 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)		this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)
	I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)		I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)
		+	:I think you're right about this. This page and [[PND:FAQ]] do significantly overlap. It would be a good idea to merge them (but the questions on this page a bit more newbie-friendly, so they should be listed first in the FAQ). Basically, I propose that this whole page could be copied into "PND:FAQ" as the FIRST SECTION, so "The PND system" (which is currently section 1 there) would now be section 2.
		+
		+	:However, that's not the only problem here. The other problem is that the pages, though mostly accurate, are outdated by a few years, as witnessed by the fact that they still mention PMenu even though that hasn't existed for years. We really need a dev or a team member to take a look at both and fix the potential errors. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 09:06, 29 April 2011 (MEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 27 April 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Hi,		Hi,
	this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)		this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)
		+	I like to keep the topic PND straight forward due to it's massive relevance. So we should use [[PND]] as an general introduction, [[PND FAQ]] as a general FAQ style and of course [[libPND]] for introducing in development with [[PXML]] --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 11:39, 27 April 2011 (MEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:14, 23 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==I want to override the .PND icon, name, or other settings, how is this done?==		==I want to override the .PND icon, name, or other settings, how is this done?==
	This section mentions changing the clock speed, but [[Overclocking]] seems to cover the current method. I'm not sure... --[[User:Tsh\|Tsh]] 01:24, 25 February 2011 (MET)		This section mentions changing the clock speed, but [[Overclocking]] seems to cover the current method. I'm not sure... --[[User:Tsh\|Tsh]] 01:24, 25 February 2011 (MET)
		+
		+	== Merge with PND:FAQ ==
		+
		+	Hi,
		+	this article is pretty much like a FAQ. What about outsourcing this questions and strip it back to a very basic "a PND is XYZ and you use it like XYZ..."? --[[User:ABC\|ABC]] 08:14, 23 April 2011 (MEST)