<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://pandorawiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Timofonic</id>
	<title>Pandora Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pandorawiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Timofonic"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pandorawiki.org/Special:Contributions/Timofonic"/>
	<updated>2026-10-21T20:39:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Port_requests&amp;diff=1880</id>
		<title>Talk:Port requests</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Port_requests&amp;diff=1880"/>
		<updated>2010-01-02T18:43:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Timofonic: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Numptyphysics is shown here: http://amethyst.openembedded.net/~koen/narcissus/&lt;br /&gt;
Seems to be supported already - Didn&#039;t test it yet though&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last Carrier Instant Messenger SVN change was 2 month ago, do we really need that? Isn&#039;t Pidgin enough? We should have some sort of priority system because I have the feeling that some games and apps are just added here to have a bigger list - no matter what quality the entries are. Personally I know a lot of people who use Pidgin, no-one seems to have used Carrier yet. --JayFoxRox&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, I use Carrier. It was created because Pidgin had( has) an annoying feature that the developers in charge refused to make optional. They generally keep up with Pidgin versions, although it&#039;s one version behind at the moment. As I understand it, this is basically a list of &#039;&#039;portable&#039;&#039; apps that are wanted by at least one person from the Pandora community. It would be problematic making a &amp;quot;priority system&amp;quot;. The point, I think, is for the devs to just scroll around and see if there&#039;s anything that they&#039;d like to port. I guess one way to make a &amp;quot;priority system&amp;quot; is to have some kind of voting or something... in which case, a developer can choose some apps from here and start a poll on the GP32X forums to see which is most popular. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:17, 27 May 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You can sign your name and date with four tildes at the end of your message ~ ~ ~ ~ (but without spaces). [[User:Esn|Esn]] 09:20, 27 May 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know why GemRB [http://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Port_Requests&amp;amp;diff=1356&amp;amp;oldid=1354 was removed]? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 05:29, 7 June 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just had a poke around, turns out GemRB is now a WIP courtesy of Adventus. ;-) We need to (somehow) encourage people to use the Summary box when making changes! [[User:Gruso|Gruso]] 23:27, 7 June 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a bunch of stuff to the list, I hope it can be interesting to some people. But it&#039;s a pain to order the list alphabetically, any form of automatize the proccess? [[User:Timofonic|Timofonic]] 19:43, 2 January 2010 (MET)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Timofonic</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>