<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://pandorawiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Enverex</id>
	<title>Pandora Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pandorawiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Enverex"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pandorawiki.org/Special:Contributions/Enverex"/>
	<updated>2026-04-23T17:46:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.32.0-alpha</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Software_projects&amp;diff=1442</id>
		<title>Talk:Software projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Software_projects&amp;diff=1442"/>
		<updated>2009-08-08T21:30:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Enverex: /* &amp;quot;Where in world is... &amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think the games should be split into ports and original games. Of course, this might sometimes be hard to decide, for example with Wizzley Presto, which is a new original game but could also be called a port from the iPhone version... [[User:OrR|OrR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that's a good idea. But I got stuck on that same blurred line while planning a blog feature for homebrew games. Wizzley Presto is one, also GP2X games like Pool Panic and Battle Jewels. For my purposes (being to showcase our scene's own work) I decided that these games should fall under originals, because (i) it's all talent from within our scene, and (ii) the original authors are doing the porting. I don't know if we can apply such subjective rules to wiki categories though. [[User:Gruso|Gruso]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about 3 categories:&lt;br /&gt;
*ports of classic games&lt;br /&gt;
*ports from other platforms&lt;br /&gt;
*original Pandora games&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:OrR|OrR]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Then I propose not splitting the list, but simply adding another column onto the end and marking each game &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;original&amp;quot;, etc.. That way, if anyone wants to, he can &amp;quot;sort&amp;quot; the table into the correct categories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:On an unrelated note, I can't seem to figure out where to put GemRB. It doesn't seem to be a &amp;quot;game&amp;quot; as such, but a game engine port. But should it go into &amp;quot;emulators&amp;quot; along with ScummVM? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 00:17, 10 June 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Where in world is... &amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is an entry under Games named &amp;quot;Where in world is... &amp;quot; which just links back to a Polish blog and doesn't appear to be a real game/application. Can anyone confirm this is a genuine entry? [[User:Enverex|Enverex]] 23:30, 8 August 2009 (MEST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Enverex</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Software_projects&amp;diff=1441</id>
		<title>Talk:Software projects</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pandorawiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Software_projects&amp;diff=1441"/>
		<updated>2009-08-08T21:30:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Enverex: New section: &amp;quot;Where in world is... &amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think the games should be split into ports and original games. Of course, this might sometimes be hard to decide, for example with Wizzley Presto, which is a new original game but could also be called a port from the iPhone version... [[User:OrR|OrR]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that's a good idea. But I got stuck on that same blurred line while planning a blog feature for homebrew games. Wizzley Presto is one, also GP2X games like Pool Panic and Battle Jewels. For my purposes (being to showcase our scene's own work) I decided that these games should fall under originals, because (i) it's all talent from within our scene, and (ii) the original authors are doing the porting. I don't know if we can apply such subjective rules to wiki categories though. [[User:Gruso|Gruso]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How about 3 categories:&lt;br /&gt;
*ports of classic games&lt;br /&gt;
*ports from other platforms&lt;br /&gt;
*original Pandora games&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:OrR|OrR]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Then I propose not splitting the list, but simply adding another column onto the end and marking each game &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;original&amp;quot;, etc.. That way, if anyone wants to, he can &amp;quot;sort&amp;quot; the table into the correct categories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:On an unrelated note, I can't seem to figure out where to put GemRB. It doesn't seem to be a &amp;quot;game&amp;quot; as such, but a game engine port. But should it go into &amp;quot;emulators&amp;quot; along with ScummVM? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 00:17, 10 June 2009 (CEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Where in world is... &amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is an entry under Games named &amp;quot;Where in world is... &amp;quot; which just links back to a Polish blog and doesn't appear to be a real game/application. Can anyone confirm this is a genuine entry?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Enverex</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>